4+ hours / day
reviewing and coordinating technical documents, per person.
Per person, per day. Time that should be spent on the work that actually moves the project forward.
AI Design Review for Construction Teams
Free your teams from wasted time searching drawings and fixing costly site mistakes.
Ingenium reviews your design information like an experienced project team - identifying clashes, compliance gaps and buildability risks early to reduce RFIs, change orders and construction risk.
Teams are expected to review impossible volumes of ever-evolving information - where a small change in one drawing can quietly affect many others.
The numbers tell the story:
reviewing and coordinating technical documents, per person.
Per person, per day. Time that should be spent on the work that actually moves the project forward.
are lost annually in the UK due to building errors.
Caused by information that doesnt line up across drawings - or arrives too late to review properly.
are repeat mistakes we already know how to prevent.
Because lessons from previous issues rarely get captured and shared effectively.
Thats not a people problem. Its an information problem.
Identify inconsistencies, buildability risk and compliance issues before they become problems out on-site.
Track and summarise design revisions so commercial and programme impacts are clear and auditable. Know exactly what changed, when, and what it means for cost and programme.
Apply lessons learned from past projects to new designs. Stop making the same mistakes twice.
Proposes data-driven solutions using insights from project history, building regulations, and identifies compliant products that meet the design requirements.
View retrieved source documents to check findings and compile design packs - whether for Gateway 2, tender submissions, or technical workshops.
Auto-generate RFIs and export reports for design reviews, technical workshops and email communications so that verified issues can be acted upon.
Risk: Part B compliance failure.
Ductwork passing through protected lobbies without appropriate smoke control measures creates regulatory risk. Ingenium cross-references fire strategy, architectural and MEP drawings to surface these conflicts early.
Risk: Rework and coordination disputes.
Height variances between architect and specialist contractor drawings such as shims not being accounted for behind fixing brackets are identified across related documents to prevent downstream installation conflict.
Risk: Fire stopping non-compliance and potential Building Regulations / fire strategy failure.
The Employers Requirements specified a fire-rated intumescent putty pad, however the electrical contractors scope referenced a different system. Neither solution had been tested for installation within the 97 mm fire-rated wall shown on the architects drawings. Ingenium identifies specification conflicts, verifies tested wall build-ups against design details, and retrieves compliant product alternatives before installation.
Risk: Water ingress and NHBC 6.1.21 non-compliance.
Parapet wall build-ups where a damp proof course is omitted despite the cavity being interrupted by masonry support are a recurring envelope failure. Ingenium analyses the wall build-up and flags this condition before construction.
“A full design review cycle that normally took three days was completed in less than one using Ingenium. We originally set out to reduce review time by 30%, but the results far exceeded that.”
Joe Craven
Operations Director
Key result
3 days
to <1 day
The initial target was a 30% reduction. The trial cycle finished more than 66% faster.
Encryption in transit and at rest, with role-based access controls aligned to Cyber Essentials standards.
Securely hosted in a private environment, with deployment options aligned to your IT requirements.
Designed to operate alongside your existing document management and BIM workflows without disrupting how your team works.
Now onboarding live project partners. If improving design quality is a focus for your team this year, let's look at where the review effort is getting stuck.